Author Archives: josephwu

Energy delivery in the USA

A lot of op-eds get written about the future of energy, but very few tables of hard data get published. Tables are certainly boring and easy to gloss over, but are probably much easier to understand and comprehend for someone who is motivated to learn.

I was able to find the above data online from the department of energy. The analogy I see here is back in the early 2000s when Netflix was shipping more data via mail then through their own servers. We currently ship more energy via gasoline than we do through our electrical grid.

The pattern between the two energy delivery systems is somewhat surprising. I would have thought the increased push for efficiency in automobiles as well as the increasing purchase of electric vehicles would have put downward pressure on gasoline in relation to home energy usage. I’m not sure how rooftop solar gets accounted for in these numbers, but perhaps that is what is driving this trend?

This data also suggests that in order for gasoline to disappear, the electrical grid would have to be able to provide roughly 125% more energy than it does today, assuming a 1:1 translation between the two. (Cursory reading of electric grid efficiency vs gasoline efficiency suggests this isn’t a horrible assumption) That seems like a daunting task that will take decades, regardless of the adoption rate of electric vehicles.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

How to pay for college with less money.

It may be somewhat counter-intuitive, but many well to do folks carry debt. Even the world’s largest corporations carry debt. There are a multitude of reasons that these people do so, and one of these is called leverage.

The most prevalent form of leverage in the US is a home purchase. A home is a great way to store value, but most people don’t have enough cash to purchase one directly. In order to do so, they take money from a bank as a loan called a mortgage. This allows folks to purchase a home for somewhere between 3% and 20% of the total cost of the house. The ratio of the total cost to the money that you put in is called the leverage ratio. So for 20% down, that ratio would be 100% / 20% = 5. This is most commonly stated as 5x, or a 5 times leverage ratio.

Let’s see why this leverage ratio is important. If we buy a house for $100,000 with 20% down, we will have paid $20,000. This will give us a leverage ratio of 5x. If the house value increases by 3% to $103,000 and we sell it, we will pocket $3,000 in profit (ignoring transactional costs and loan interest). This profit, stated as a percentage of our down payment, is $3,000 / $20,000 = 15%. Notice how the 15% return is 5 times the 3% return of the actual house. This is directly related to the fact that we purchased the property with a 5x leverage ratio.

Of course, the reverse is also true. When the house loses value, the homeowner will experience the loss at a rate 5 times what the house experiences. So in this example, a total loss would be $100,000 or 500% of the $20,000 the homeowner paid.

So how do we use this to pay for a really large expense like college? Let’s say college costs $25,000 per year for 4 years. Let’s also say that houses can be purchased and rented out for a 5% profit per year. Then in this scenario, a house will have to be worth $25,000 / 5% = $500,000 to produce $25,000 per year to pay for college. We can then use leverage provided by a bank to purchase the house for 25% down, or $100,000. We still need $100,000 to pay for our kid’s college, but after 4 years, we will have a rental house producing $25,000 per year and a kid with a college degree instead of just a kid with a college degree. Additionally, the $100,000 will still be stored in the house’s value. This all works out because the leverage ratio of 4x in the example translates the 5% return of the house to a 20% return.

If you purchased a house at the same time you started a family and are then trying to send your kid to college 18 years later, there will probably be a significant amount of value stored in the home. You can unlock this stored value without selling your home with a home equity line of credit (or HELOC). If you use this HELOC as the down pay for the scenario above, you will have essentially paid for your kid’s college with no money out of your pocket.

This general line of thinking is called asset-liability matching. We are matching an asset (the rental house) to pay for a liability (cost of sending kid to college). By using leverage, we are able to greatly reduce the out of pocket cost of sending our kid to college. This is a very simple example and inherently carries various types of risk that are greatly magnified by the leverage. Every person’s situation is different and this may or may not be a good decision for you. Please consult with a professional before attempting anything like this.

There are many ways to do this and getting assets and liabilities to match sometimes requires a great deal of creativity and maneuvering. If you are really good at asset-liability matching, life insurance companies and banks pay top dollar for this type of talent.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Biking Everywhere

If you are like me and live in the urban core or on the fringes of it for a large city, you will typically have a myriad of transportation options available to you. I have the options as varied as buses, express buses, subway, commuter rail, walking, taxis, cars, zipcar, lyft, motorcycle, and last but not least and my favorite, the bicycle. I’ve been commuting to work by bicycle since 2010 and it has become an enjoyable part of my daily routine. Some of my friends know me as the “triathlon guy” which usually translates into a fair amount of bicycling and swimming questions.

I’m writing this post as a reference point that I can point people to as a guide to getting started with biking. Biking is a diverse sport with many different disciplines so it is impossible to write a guide to encompass it all. So the target audience for this guide is someone who is thinking of using a bike as a supplemental or primary means of transportation, rather than any sort of primarily recreational purpose.

How the hell does this fit into my dollars and sense blog? Uhmmm biking saves you money. Totally. I promise. Pay no mind to the hundreds (thousands?) I’ve poured into my bike(s).

Step 1, the bike.

Biking is generally broken down into 2 categories, road bikes and mountain bikes. Any other sort of classification of bike is usually meant as some sub-classification of these two that is meant to serve some niche market. The following are 3 bikes that work as a good base for commuting and are relatively cheap.

Schwinn Men’s Volare 1200 700C Flat Bar Road Bicycle, Blue/Black, 18-Inch
This is the bike that I started commuting on (or at least the 2010 version of it) This is a solid bike that is really suited for folks between 5’6″ and 6’1″ and is sturdy enough for up to about a 180 pound rider. If you aren’t in that category, you might want to try one of the other bikes below. This bike comes in only one size.

This bike is a hybrid bike, which is a type of road bike built for a more relaxed upright seating position and slightly wider tires for durability and comfort. It is rather heavy and has only 21 gears, but these drawbacks aren’t going to be deal breakers when it lets you get into a bike for about $300 brand new. This really represents the bare minimum quality of bike I would recommend if you are going to rely on it for transportation. There are cheaper geared bikes out there, but the couple of bucks you’ll save will be eaten up the first time it leaves you stranded with a mechanical malfunction.

I even raced this bike in my first triathlon. It is a cheap, durable, dependable bike. All great qualities for a first bike.

Critical Cycles Fixed Gear Single Speed Fixie Urban Road Bike
This is a single geared road bike, more commonly referred to as a fixie. These things are quite a craze among hipsters. The real reason I’m recommending this is because if $300 for the volare is too expensive, then this lets you get in for a bit cheaper at $220 without sacrificing quality. Instead, this bike sacrifices quantity. As a single geared bike, it does not need a whole list of parts that the geared bike has on it necessary for changing gears as you ride. This will be a good alternative if the areas you bike in will be incredibly flat. Gears primarily come into play to help climb hills and without the mechanical assistance of being able to switch to a lower gear, the fixie will be tougher to get up hills. As you ride more and develop leg strength, hills that were once insurmountable will be less of a challenge. Worst comes to worst, you may have to walk it up the tougher hills, which isn’t the worst thing in the world.

Other benefits of losing all the gear parts is that you won’t have to maintain them, which on a cheaper bike is a constant ritual. Just clean the chain every once in a while and replace the brake pads as they wear and this bike should give you good service for as long as you enjoy riding it. If you are going to go this route, I highly recommend adding a front brake to the bike as that will drastically increase your braking power and allow you to stop significantly quicker.

Nashbar AT2 Mountain Bike – 15″
Out of the 3 bikes, this is the only mountain bike. If you are serious about making a bicycle your primary means of transportation, then you will want something that is going to serve you well in all types of climates. This particular mountain bike is equipped with disc brakes while the other two bikes are equipped with rim brakes. The performance of a rim brake will deteriorate significantly in inclement weather such as rain or snow. A disc brake doesn’t have this issue due to its design. This is a rare and and expensive item on road bikes, but fairly common on mountain bikes.

If you are dedicated to riding your bike rain or shine, then this will offer better performance in less than ideal conditions at a still affordable $300.

Step 2, Safety First! Wait, why is it step 2?
A helmet is necessary in most places. The only difference in helmets as you go up in price are style, brand, and performance (aerodynamics for the real speed demons out there). There is absolutely no difference in safety characteristics.
Schwinn Thrasher Adult Micro Bicycle black/grey Helmet (Adult) is a $18 helmet that’ll be just as safe as the more expensive helmets. If you ever get caught riding in the dark, you’ll need some lights as well. CatEye HL-EL135N/Omni 3 TL-LD135 Combo is a good basic choice.

Locks are a bit of a personal choice and depending on where you leave your bike, you may need more security or less. I’m lucky enough to be able to park my bikes in pretty secure areas. I use Kuat Bottle Lock (Black) to keep my bike secure, but you may want to invest in a more heavy duty lock. If you use a lock that comes with some sort of bike protection guarantee, keep in mind that they require proof that the lock was broken and various other things that make it nearly impossible to actually file a claim.

Step 3, Tools
The following is a list of basic tools that should be part of any commuter’s kit. Bikes aren’t immune to flats. These tools will help when you experience your first flat. It might be a good idea to watch some youtube videos on how to fix a flat as well. If you order your bike online, the Alien III tool and a bike pump is enough to assemble your bike when it arrives.

  • Topeak Alien III Mini Folding Bicycle Tool
  • Park Tool VP-1 Vulcanizing Patch Kit (Single)
  • Schwinn Aluminum Frame Pump
  • Serfas TCPG Bicycle Floor Pump
  • Step 4, Comfort
    If you made it this far and are still interested in commuting with your bicycle, here are some items that can make it more comfortable. These are just a few items as suggestions, but the value of these things will really depend on your preference. There is a wide variety of products that meet these needs so you might be better off researching something that suits your own taste.

  • Pearl Izumi Men’s Select Glove, Black, Medium – A pair of gel padded gloves makes things a lot more comfortable on long rides for your hands.
  • Avenir Bigmouth Velcro Seat Bag (Medium- 55/73 Cubic Inches – Any storage will make your bike more useful
  • Axiom Journey Uni-Fit MK 3 Rear Rack: Aluminum – Racks have a lot of different designs and are not compatible with all bikes. Do your research before picking a rack. I like this rack because it is compatible with most bikes used in commuting. With or without eyelets, rim or disc brakes, skinny road tire or fatter mountain bike tire, this thing has a lot of compatibility. Not sturdy enough to tour on, but definitely sturdy enough for commuting duty.
  • Black Multi-functional Bicycle Rear Seat Trunk Bag Shoulder Handbag Bag Pannier – Once you have picked your rack, you’ll need a bag that mounts to it to actually hold stuff. A lot of variety here, so pick one that’ll be suitable for what you need to carry
  • Full Windsor Quickfix Rear Fender – Black – Get caught in the rain once and you’ll quickly realize the value of a fender.
  • CamelBak Podium Chill Bottle (Racing Red, 21 -Ounce) – Easily the best water bottle I’ve come across for biking.
  • Avenir Alloy Water Bicycle Bottle Cage (Silver) – Makes it easy to carry water bottles. Most bikes accept these things on two tubes of the inner triangle, allowing you to carry two. I usually put a water bottle in one and the Kuat Bottle Lock (Black) in the other.
  • Leave a Comment

    Filed under Uncategorized

    The absolute dollar method

    Another debt reduction balancing method that I’ve come up with is what I call the “absolute dollar method”. The basic premise of this method is that for every extra dollar that you use to pay down your debt, you should receive at least one dollar of interest savings over the life of the loan. This is a bit more cumbersome than the the debt pricing method I went over in a previous post as it takes some discipline in maintaining a spreadsheet of your debts to quickly assess how much interest savings your extra payments are generating from month to month. This requires updating the spreadsheet every time you make even your regular payments. I can discuss the finer points of creating a spreadsheet like this if you care to comment at the bottom of the post.

    I like to use this method when I am paying down debt for a non income producing asset. Sorry, I should have warned you I was about to use financial vocabulary there. (Artists aren’t the only ones that use special words to make themselves feel important!) What this means is that this is a good method for paying down things like credit card debt or other debt used to purchase things where the thing you purchased does not retain its value. A good example is credit card debt or student debt. A bad example is the mortgage on a house.

    I make this distinction because the principal from debts related to credit cards or student loans don’t have a tangible material thing to store the value of that paid down extra principal. When you pay an extra dollar towards the principal on your home mortgage, it is a dollar you will eventually get back when you sell the house. This isn’t true for credit card debt. When you pay down an extra dollar in principal on your credit card debt, there is nothing for you to sell later on to recoup that extra dollar of payment. The only return you are getting on that extra dollar of payment is interest savings. Under this scenario, does it make sense to pay an extra dollar to your credit card debt if it is only going to save you 25 cents in interest? (If this sounds good to you, please contact me. I have a lot of quarters I’d like to trade with you)

    For a dollar to produce a dollar in interest savings, there has to be enough time remaining on the debt for that extra payment to generate enough interest savings over the remaining term to be equal to the dollar. As time goes on, there is less incentive for you to pay down your debt. This method reflects that by suggesting to not make any extra payments near the end of the life of the debt.

    What do you think of this method? Let me know in the comments section!

    Leave a Comment

    Filed under Debt

    The debt pricing method

    In my previous post, I mentioned that I would discuss some methods for determining what your sweet spot is for balancing getting out of debt with living your life. Today I will be discussing one such method that I like to call “debt pricing”. The nice thing about this method is that it takes very little work to setup and gives you a nice rule of thumb as you make your financial decisions on a daily basis.

    We all go through our days making a myriad of seemingly mundane choices that when considered over time can have serious impact on our financial situation. Some examples include getting Starbucks coffee in the morning vs making your own coffee, buying lunch vs packing a lunch, and so on. We all encounter various situations like this through our daily lives and have learned to make value judgments to decide how we are going to spend our money in these situations. Some of these choices are habit based, like a caffeine addiction, and others are made around convenience. The debt pricing method allows you to quickly add the impact your purchase decisions will have on your debt with some quick mental math so it is convenient to consider.

    Lets work through a quick example to see how this method actually works. The debt pricing method relies on computing a debt multiplier. It is the amount by which one extra payment in the next year will reduce the overall cost of the debt. So the method takes your current payment amount and considers what your total payment will be for the loan if you paid just 1 extra payment of your regular amount 6 months from now (the mid point of the next year).

    If there are enough requests for a tool that can let you calculate this multiplier simply, I will build and share one. For now, you’ll have to trust the numbers I’m discussing in this example – or as an academic would say: left as an exercise for you to verify.

    Lets say you are a fresh graduate with $100,000 in student loans at 6% interest for a term of 25 years. In this case, your monthly payment would be 644.30 assuming traditional monthly compounding loan interest and not the peculiar student loan interest calculation the government uses (a topic for another post!). Over 25 years, the total amount of payment for this loan would total $193,934.72. If you paid one extra payment of $644.30 six months from now, your overall total payment for this loan would drop to $191,166.01 for a savings of $2,768.72. The debt multiplier would then be calculated as the total savings divided by the extra payment, or 4.3 (4.3 = 2,768.72 / 644.30).

    The way to interpret this multiplier is that on average over the next year, every extra dollar you put into the loan will save you $4.30 over the life of the loan! You can then use this multiplier to quickly consider the cost of your debt in purchasing decisions.

    If a hypothetical person with no debt is trying to decide to buy Starbucks coffee for $5.00 vs making their own for $1.00, that person would have to decide if the Starbucks represents $4.00 in additional value vs the home made coffee. The person with the $100,000 debt in the example above shouldn’t be considering the $4.00 difference, but the $4.00 multiplied by the debt multiplier of 4.3, or $17.20. Perhaps on really tough days, that Starbucks coffee will be worth it for the debt laden person and on other days not so much. Hopefully the debt pricing method doesn’t remove Starbucks coffee forever from this person’s lifestyle, but perhaps modifies the behavior to a less frequent level that naturally balances towards this sweet spot of balancing paying off debt and indulging in other activities.

    The nice thing about this method is that once you have calculated the multiplier, it is easy to apply in daily life without some overly complicated system or have a lot of administrative over head of keeping on top of budgets and tracking expenses. All it does is ask you to develop a habit of applying the multiplier in your daily purchase decisions to help you decide if those things are really worth it to you.

    Another nice property is that you can recalculate the multiplier annually. As you work on paying off your debt over the year, the multiplier will naturally lower. This is due to several reasons including that there is less term left on the loan and less time for your extra payments to save you interest and the fact that each additional dollar of pre-payment saves a little bit less interest. So if you pay off more of the loan in the coming year, you will be rewarded in a sense with a lower multiplier the next year. This will allow you to gradually increase the amount of money you would like to spend on other things besides debt over time, making it more manageable.

    What do you think about the debt pricing method? Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

    1 Comment

    Filed under Debt

    Know your limit for paying off debt

    There are many strategies to get out of debt. Sometimes it can be a challenge to pick the best method specifically for you. There are many forum posts out there with questions along the lines of out of these three methods of getting out of debt, which one is the best for me? I am writing this post to try and motivate some discussion and thoughts on how to make this sort of judgement. I hope that being able to better judge which strategy is best for you will also help pay dividends when it comes to other decisions not just involving getting out of debt, but also getting into debt.

    The main criteria most people use to judge a get out of debt scheme is the amount of interest the strategy will save you. If you only think about this criteria when coming up with a get out of debt strategy, the problem becomes a very simple math problem with only one solution: pay off more debt as soon as financially possible. This sort of attitude, while laudable from perhaps a moral imperative, is typically not sustainable for a variety of uncontrollable circumstances (some sort of emergency comes up) or other human factors of unhappiness from the stress of a high level of sacrifice over whatever extended period of time it takes to get out of debt.

    Naturally, if paying off as much debt as soon as possible isn’t sustainable, scaling back to some level that is sustainable is wise. Now we enter into a grey area of trying to balance two objectives of 1. minimizing the cost of your debt (interest) and 2. paying off the debt at a reasonable, sustainable level. The balance between these two will vary from person to person and where you are on this spectrum will depend on your own limit for paying off debt.

    When most people begin seriously tackling their debt, they arrive at this point and get stuck here. I have seen people who get frustrated because they enter into a vicious cycle of feeling remorse over indulging in something no matter how small because of its cost and despair over having to sacrifice opportunities for happiness to deal with their debt. I’ll be posting various ways you can experiment with to find out what your sweet spot is.

    1 Comment

    Filed under Uncategorized